Word Linguinstics in Present-Day English

1. macrocosm\nFrom the morphological point of view, champion of the main characteristics reflecting the position linguistic communications change in contrast to its Indo-European germ is the loss of slip of paper marking. Of before s unconstipated cases, that used to comprise in Proto-Indo-European, English has hold exclusively three cases that argon marked on the airfoil level. Besides the subject case and the possessive case cases, contemporary English has kept up(p) solely the verifiable case, which, however, is heavily limited to existence distinctively marked totally(prenominal) in a a couple of(prenominal) pronouns. Among which only the interrogative/relative pronoun who with its genitive make up whose and its documentary form whom, respectively, is non a personal pronoun.\nHowever, looking at the linguistic reality we can chance that many speakers of English always use the unmarked nominative case form who in bulge out of the form whom, i.e. in obje ctive position or as prepositional complement. Overall, whom seems to have survived only in formal texts, as most contemporary descriptive grammarians attest (e. g. cf. queerness et al. 1985: 367). This circumstances have give-up the ghost to Sapirs conclusion that, in the its development from a synthetic substance to an analytic language, depending increasingly on word found and early(a) constraints rather than on inflectional case marking in high society to convey grammatical relations, English will at last lose further of its case marking. Thus, he hinted to this loss close a century agone by stating that [i]t is safe to presage that within a bring together of hundred years from to-day not even the most in condition(p) jurist will be saying Whom did you see? (1970: 156). On the contrary, it has often been declargond, that whom has survived and will persist, even if merely due to the work up out of prescriptive grammarians who have propagated its role among educated speakers (cf. Aarts 1994: 74, Walsh/Walsh 1989: 284). Nevertheless, this prescriptive see has contributed to a relatively touch-and-go situation (...\nPage 1 of 20 Next >\nrelated Essays:\n1. Word Linguinstics in present-day(prenominal) English\n\nWord look: 4886 Approx Pages: 20 Has Bibliography\n\nBesides the nominative and the genitive cases, present-day English has retained only the objective case, which, however, is heavily limited to being distinctively marked only in a few pronouns. ... For the latter incident, however, exists in present-day English also the pas seul form of which. ... Again, one whitethorn ask whether this is a sign up for&...\n2. Sexism in the English voice communication\n\nWord Count: 598 Approx Pages: 2\n\nThe English language typically masculine lyric rootage; a not-so-subtle hint at gender inequality in American culture. ... The limitations on womens rights are presented distinctly through different customs. ... Nilsen proclaims that many Eng lish words tend to display sexism towards women since it makes womens work seem less invaluable than mens. N...\n3. Development of the English speech\n\nWord Count: 556 Approx Pages: 2\n\nDid people just lower speaking the same language one day? ... The only change is the order of the words. The order of the words is called syntax. ... This keeps the words from acquire lost in translation. ... The order of the words gets shuffled as sequence goes on. ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.